About Us | FAQ | Contact | Advertise  | RSS Feed
Subscribe to this feed
ADVANCE for Nurses RSS Feed
Search
Login | Sign Up

Subscriptions are FREE to Qualified Nursing Professionals


Features

Resolving Back Pain in Nurses

Nurses' lower backs are susceptible to injury because lumbar support muscles are extremely weak.

View Comments (9)Print ArticleEmail Article

The high incidences of back pain among nurses are well documented. Dozens of books, studies and articles exist on the subject.

According to the U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics, nurses and other medical attendants accounted for roughly 20 percent of all days away from work in 2006, mainly as a result of sprains and strains to the torso muscles.1  

A study by the University of Alberta's Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine found 65 percent of orthopedic nurses and 58 percent of ICU nurses develop debilitating low back pain at some point in their careers.2 "Nurses suffer from work-related low back pain more often than workers in other professions," stated the study's lead author.

Lisa Armstrong, RN, an operating room nurse at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, strengthens and adds flexibility to her lower back using a lumbar exercise machine with pelvic restraint. photo courtesy Back2Health: Spinal Fitness

Due to the nature of the job, it seems most nurses have resigned themselves to living with some level of discomfort. Those who refuse to accept this malady as permanent often try various methods to reduce pain and increase quality of life. The majority of those methods offer varying degrees of relief, but none of them attack the problem from where it stems.

Incomplete Approaches

The inclusion of patient lifts within "zero-lift" hospital policies would be a great aid to nursing in general, and the issue of back pain in nurses specifically. However, this policy is currently used in few hospitals (roughly 5 percent as of 2007), and, very importantly, the use of these lifts will not aid those already injured.3 So while it would be a mistake to call the use of these lifts "ineffective," it is not a stretch to call them an "incomplete" solution.   

Additionally, lower back problems do not only result from a sudden impact possible during a patient lift, but also from the repetitive nature of the job with regard to standing, bending, and holding certain positions during a shift, and the totality of such within a week, a month and a career. The typical ergonomic recommendations are quickly forgotten during a moment of crisis, and are hard to maintain during a long shift.    

In attempts to relieve discomfort and improve functional ability (which includes vocational activities), nurses may choose from many methods.  

If staying within the traditional medical establishment, a doctor's visit will frequently lead to physical therapy. However, this "therapy" usually consists of a series of stretches and/or easy exercise with ineffective tools. For reasons discussed below, most do not receive benefit equal to time committed.

For those moving outside of the traditional medical establishment, to "alternative" methods, various options exist.  Chiropractic, acupuncture/acupressure, Pilates, yoga. all of these seem to have "some" merit depending on whom one speaks with (i.e., most people know someone who swears by one of these methods).  

However, none deal with the problem at its core.    

Core of the Problem

In the cases where both the traditional and alternative methods "help," it is mostly likely the result of the injured area returning to normal on its own.  

Roughly 80 percent of lower back injuries heal naturally within the first 2-3 months following injury. Of the remaining 20 percent, something else is needed.4

Nurses, due to the chronic nature of lower back pathology across the board, would typically fall into this 20 percent.  

The reason the lower back is so susceptible to injury, both in nursing and in the general population, is the muscles that support the lumbar spine are extremely weak. Were these muscles extremely strong, the likelihood of injury or general discomfort would be minimal.  

However, sometimes the simplest solutions are the least likely to be arrived at, and this is the case with lower back problems.  

The reason for this weakness is overuse. Every action the human body makes relies on the activation of the spinal muscles to maintain posture and efficiency of movement. Consider how often one adjusts one's positioning while sitting at a desk, or while standing for an extended period of time - the muscles of the lumbar spine are working non-stop.  

And while this work is far from challenging, since the spinal muscles are typically comprised of predominately fast-twitch (and fast-to-fatigue) fibers, everyday activity results in overuse. In fact, spinal muscles begin to atrophy early, at around age 20.5 

Regardless of diagnosis, the issue stems from weak lumbar musculature. The chance of disc slippage, rupture, degeneration, etc., would be limited if the support system for the spine were strong enough to withstand most of the strain placed upon it.   


Resolving Back Pain in Nurses

 Next >
1 | 2 | 3

  Last Post: July 27, 2009 | View Comments(9)

You are correct that the unsafe work environment has a great deal to do with this problem. However, in such a dynamic environment, it is impossible to isolate each and every instance during one's career that may lead to injury. Nurses are not robots, and even the manner in which one will deal with a particular situation will vary amongst the population.

Additionally, since the lumbar muscles atrophy early, this weak link is always going to be there unless preemptive measures are taken.

Athletes were mentioned as not always being able to avoid injury. While this is a different context due to the nature of the activity/vocation (athlete vs. nurse), part of the reason for strength training in athletics is to reduce the chance of injury via a stronger structure being able to withstand greater forces - AND limit the degree of severity if injury does occur.

Adam Reid,  'The Author'July 27, 2009
Hanover, MA



Just a thought - but is not the main problem really that the staff has an unsafe work environemnt? Of course it is beneficial for everyony to excersie but should you not be able to perfom your tasks safely even if you are not an athlete - and furthermore beeing an athlete will not positivley help you aviod muscloskeletal injuries.

The work place need to be safe and correct medical technical aides should always be utlized. That WILL decrease injuries.

First things first July 27, 2009



RE Pilates:

Regarding general weakness of the core muscles being 'the root of many low back injuries and pain':

As far as you would like to include all the core muscles equally in this equation, you are incorrect. Standing upright, if one were to slice the abdomen - completely severing horizontally the muscles on the 'front of the core' - he or she would continue to stand upright. If one were to do the same to the lumbar extensors - completely severing the muscles on the 'back of the core' - one's torso would fall forward. The lumbar muscles are necessary to support the spine in it's ideal (naturally arched) position. The abdominal muscles simply help to control the pelvis, aiding in posture, and reinforce the back extensor fascia by pulling them sideways when bending forward. But the abdominals are not the support system for the spine that people think they are.

I don't have time for a point by point refutation of the rest of the post, but quickly several things come to mind:

1) It is impossible to strengthen the lumbar muscles via pilates. It is impossible to do so with any tool other than a machine w/ pelvic restraint. Muscles need direct resistance, and consistent overload, something which Pilates cannot do. Additionally, only such a machine is capable of testing strength via isometric exertion at various points of the lumbar muscles 72-degree ROM, as this also must account for stored energy, geographical positioning of head/torso, etc. Comparing Pilates to such a tool is like comparing a small hand shovel to a backhoe for the purpose of digging in a copper mine.

2) Not attacking the weakest link in a chain, i.e., the lumbar muscles with regard to back pain, is akin to training only the triceps during biceps rehabilitation.

3) The majority of 'functional training' tools and methods fall flat on their collective face with a firm grasp of motor learning; Pilates is no different. Unfortunately, the general public has little to no understanding of motor learning, and repeatedly fall prey to the same hoax's and gimmicks.

Adam Reid,  'The Author'July 20, 2009
Hanover, MA



Read all comments (9) >>


     

Email: *

Email, first name, comment and security code are required fields; all other fields are optional. With the exception of email, any information you provide will be displayed with your comment.

First * Last
Name:
Title Field Facility
Work:
City State
Location:

Comments: *
To prevent comment spam, please type the code you see below into the code field before submitting your comment. If you cannot read the numbers in the below image, reload the page to generate a new one.

Captcha
Enter the security code below: *

Fields marked with an * are required.